I am looking at the XXL to prototype some products out of 3/4" Baltic Birch. My main question is how hard can you push the machine and router continuously(1 Hour)? I have experience with industrial cnc equipment and 3d printers, but nothing in this realm.
The main feature on these pieces would be ~2.5" diameter, .5" deep pockets(circular, hexagonal, etc.) all across the board. Likely held down by a custom fixture, possibly using vacuum. I’m thinking .25" carbide two flute, down cutting end mill. Helix in to d.o.c./stepdown and then adaptive clear out in a spiral pattern, leaving 0.03" on the walls to clean up at the end.
Using this process, what would be the best parameters for this situation? 1/8" d.o.c. with a higher stepover and higher feed rate? 1/4" step down, less step over, slightly less feed rate? Just trying to get some optimized parameters so I can figure out how long the process would take, before I commit to it.
As per the above thread; you you can push the machine hard for 10-20hrs without issue…
The shapeoko 3 is not as rigid as the more industrial-type routers - shopbot/laguna etc, so it can’t take as deep cuts at as high a feedrate, but it will still cut wood at 100-150IPM pretty easily, and compared to other options in this price range it is the most rigid option, certainly beefier than the X-carve.
Jake, first of all I have to put my hand up and say I miscalculated - I have cut around 3200mm/min which is actually closer to 125IPM… I’ve cut at these speeds in softer timbers like pine with a 1/4" flat endmill while doing adaptive toolpaths, with a 2.5mm stepover or “optimal load” and around 5mm DOC (not at my computer so I can’t give exact figures). I also cut around this speed with a 1mm tapered ball mill while doing 3d relief carvings, though the DOC and stepover were more like 1mm and 0.25mm respectively.
pocketing with a 1/4" bit in plywood(I cannot source baltic birch plywood locally) I think 2500mm/min at 3mm DOC and 40% stepover would be pretty achievable. lots of pocketing like that I would definitely be looking at adaptive toolpath strategies, that way you are less limited by the rigidity of the machine