Jim Cindy Foster 2.c2d (800 KB)
Drew a text on text which I have done a few times. Happy with the way the new Boolean works.
When I do my tool paths I hog out with .250 and follow with .125 and .060 to get areas that the .250 misses. I cut this on scrap and the customer wanted a change in font. The scrap job went well. With the font change, I re-did everything. When I went to the simulation I noticed areas that were not going to cut.
You are right, looks like the .125 did not clear it in those areas. So for giggles I set a pocket with the .060, same indication that there would be material left. I think I will scrap this file and start again.
So I scraped the file and recreated it. No more anomalies in the simulation. Wondering if, if. I have just removed the original design from the first file and recreated in the same file. Maybe when I save the change it mixed it up some.
I don’t know. Just glad it worked out and ten min to recreate a new file was all I lost. The three hours trying to fix the problem is chalked up to learning.
If anyone would like to look at the files to see what they might see. Maybe it will save us all some time.