I was using CM 5.12 and had to pause and then stop a job. I noticed that I was not asked to power off the router. The router went to the back corner as expected but the software never asked me to power down the router. I like the prompts in the regular job flow to turn on and off the router, especially since I have a bit setter and do not want a hole drilled in it.
I downloaded 5.13 but I did not see any “Fix” in the bottom of the download screen for this issue.
Ver 513 (Note I finally updated CM from 414 to 513, so a LOT is new to me…so I may need some pointers…but…)
I clicked on Inch in the user interface, and see that everything is in inches (YAY), but the Jog Z is still at 6mm (huh) above my workpiece, which takes a minimum of 12 clicks to get to zero.
Why is it at 6mm versus say 0.300… Did I miss something?
The setting (*) page, (first tab) remembers all my setting…EXCEPT the Home (Z0Y0) preference Center. It keeps going back to Lower Left. Am I missing something?
…do you mean the bit setter, I don’t see any place for Z0 or Y0 preferences in 513.
In a side not I have been using a lot of CNCjs recently just fired up CM to check this… I forgot about the rapid after it homes. Sadly my 1/16’ 2 flute Kodiak just found a clamp at 10K mm/min, yet another touch probe I guess. Just goes to show you bad things happen when you get complacent.
On a side note…I really think yo need to be a Software guru or a real a reak geek to install CNCjs…OMG…I got it running…but wow…I lost half a head of hair (that I couldn’t afford to lose)… Somebody PLEASE write an installer program for it. OK…I vented… I hate UGS, and there isn’t crap on how to use CNCjs…I LOVE CM…I just wish it ran on my SuperGerbil…
Oh I its love and hate for me. There is a single download app that works as long as you’re on a computer not a Pi. The documentation is minimal compared to the stuff it can do, and I thought ‘hey I can code, how hard can it be to make a custom widget?’ The answer is not hard; if you have a 6 year degree in java script which I do not… @neilferreri has been my personal hero through this transition. It’s super powerful and the macros are awesome, but there is something to said about the simplicity of CM.
Ok, I took some time to read about 1.1h…sweet…I can see how that would be nice on the XL and XXL machines…they can be a little squirrelly…but the S3 is really rigid…(which is why I stick to this size).
Yuppers, with muh XL I’d love to give it a test drive. The S3’s though are a lot more rigid given the beam cross section to length ratio. Plus you have less distance on X so .0001" at one end isn’t that bad at the other. With all the metal work you do it makes sense. I see @WillAdams has looked at this, I wonder if a ‘Hold my Beer’ moment is coming .
I think you’re thinking of @Luke — physics are inexorable, and I don’t have a magic trick up my sleeve on this (and see: https://carbide3d.com/blog/2020/shapeoko-development/) — I was just remembering a previous discussion where the observation:
twice the length, half the rigidity
was made — it’s not quite that, but it’s valid, and it takes some fancy toolpathing to eke metalwork out of the larger machines.
Damnit, it’s been a long day, sorry yes,@Luke. And that was a hold my beer moment on the GRBL 1.1h. Side note if you ever figure out how to change physics let me know, I have some minor requests.