Confirm adjusting $102 z axis makes sense

I went through calibrating the x and y axis. It was off by a very small amount and I am adjusting $100 and $101 to compensate.

I then used my 123 blocks to determine whether the z axis on the stock Shapeoko Pro needed calibrating. I zeroed the router mount with two of the 123 blocks stacked on top of each other. I then removed 2” worth of 123 blocks. The distance that the z axis should have travelled down is 50.8mm. However the z axis only traveled down -50.63 (according to carbide motion). I tested this multiple times.

Additionally, when cutting MDF, the end mill has cut into the spoil board which aligns with the z axis being off.

I just wanted to validate with the brains trust that $102 is the value I should adjust and that even though the z axis is not belt driven, it also requires the calibration.

In theory yes ($102 is the way to go), and while I would expect the leadscrew/ballscrew Z axes to not usually require much calibration if any, I never owned a Z-plus (or its SO Pro variant) so it’s not impossible. I am a little surprised by the 0.3% error in your test case, but can’t tell if that is typical.

Anyway there is no harm in modifying $102, I would maybe just do two more tests:

  • checking whether there is any backlash on your Z. Depending on the way you measured it may or may not be included in the 50.63mm result. If the difference to 50.8mm happened to mainly to due backlash, there would be no point in adjusting the number of steps per mm.
  • repeating your test for various shorter and larger travel distances. If the calibration factor you get is roughly the same in all cases, then it’s a good case for adjusting $102, if not then you may enter an endless tail-chasing loop where the perfect calibration for a small distance is off for the longer moves, and vice versa. I have spent a ridiculous amount of time obsessing about calibration (this, was probably the best example of me going way too far), I now run my machine with the default steps/mm on all axes and compensate (when needed) at CAM level.
3 Likes

Thanks for the reply. I had seen in previous posts your hesitation to people calibrating based on some experience, but had never seen your quest for perfection.

Btw…I’m thinking that the mouse calibration contraption could definitely win a calibration community challenge :smile:. It’s awesome.

Also, as I went through that old post I became thoroughly confused about how Will Adam’s has anytime to post on these forums, given that he reads so much.

1 Like

There is sometimes variation in leadscrew, typically less than half a percent. I would add that in your testing to make sure there’s not any backlash in your method. IE:

  1. Lower spindle until touching 123 blocks.
  2. Remove single 123 block.
  3. Lower spindle until touching bottom block.

NOT:

  1. Raise spindle until it clears 123 Blocks
  2. Remove single 123 block.
  3. Lower spindle until touching bottom block.

You want to ensure all measurements happen without a reversal in direction of the axis. Otherwise you might add in a non-linear effect into your calibration and end up worse off.

5 Likes