If the Pro5 is gated naturally at 200ips but Motion allows it to open up to 275ips. What’s governing this in Grbl?
My instinct is to say its $110, $111 & $112:
$110=7000.000 (X-axis maximum rate, mm/min)
$111=7000.000 (Y-axis maximum rate, mm/min)
$112=3000.000 (Z-axis maximum rate, mm/min)
But if that were the case my max IPS is 4.59IPS
in/s= 7000/(60×25.4)
I feel like I’m just stupid because that makes no sense but I can’t seem to pull enough information together to solve for this. Like I mentioned here, I’m not trying to break the machine but I’d like to know the full envelope of potential so I can use the VFD further-- gated really just by the machines ability to push fast enough.
So who’s got a clue and is willing to educate because I obviously need some 'splaining.
So I don’t need to change anything to achieve 275? I’m using gSender, not Motion. I was just confused on what Motion is doing… it can only affect grbl values at the end of the day…
But I love your work around. Just modify the doc to get towards the maximal utility. Still aiming for a chipload of what .003 to .006?
Even if you change that in code and compile your own you will hit the maximum step rate of the microcontroller. 8bit microcontrollers are not fast. They can only send out so many step pulses per minute. It is why 3D printers have all pretty much moved to 32bit controllers.
So what I’m hearing is that at maximal current $110-$111 values is what does equate into 275ips. I’ve been there a while and I’m good with that (for now. xD)
I just couldn’t quite grok how the math from mm/s to in/s, where I’m guessing IPS is derived, worked.
in/s = mm/m / 60* 25.4
4.59 = 7000/(60×25.4)
The math isn’t off but my logic surely has to be.
Agreed, 8bit boards are a bygone thought. Moved up in 3dprinters years ago to 32bit SKRs and I still like to run klipper. Not enough room to store a lot, math a lot, or buffer a lot. But for the moment not quite my concern here but I know you’ve been digging on replacing and moving forward so I watch you. hehe!