The “directed suction” or the “MZD bit changing version”? Both advertised as new and improved but which is more effective? The MZD version also has a cut-out in the back to make it quicker to use with a Z-Probe and bit changing.
I have been using the “Directed Suction” version, it works pretty great suction wise. They both have a “QTC” cut out, but you do have to raise the Z-axis to be able to clear the router/spindle’s collet at times. They do offer a rear clip also (https://www.suckitdustboot.com/product-page/directed-suction-rear-clip), which I just got but haven’t used it in the field enough (once) to say if it makes a noticeable difference or not.
What really makes a difference is ensuring the brushes keep a good “seal” between the workpiece and/or table bed, i.e. if the brushes float off your stock you lose a lot of suction, causing chips to start escaping the dust boot. I have yet to develop a habit and plan ahead for that however still manageable compared to no dust boot at all.
Might also recommend getting 2" brushes, I have yet to do it but been meaning to. There is a very small margin to clear their Oops Clamps (with socket head bolts) and the SuckIt’s support arms using the included 1" brushes (when clamping 0.5" stock). Probably less issue if only using their included button head bolts, or other low profile clamps.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.