Not quite sure if that’s a failure or success on my part but I’ll file it in the Pro side for now.
Short version is that there’s rarely times that I find it’s necessary with proper feeds and speeds. Although, if those can’t be reached or maintained that would be a good reason to use one as a clean up where needed.
You’re right though that most of the problems are related to slotting (which is what they seem to mostly be used for). If you have an open side than most of the down sides are cutting force and geometry. They also tend to be more easy to break at the transition both from the meeting of the 2 cut directions and that most of the time more core has to be removed from the tool where they meet. The other option is to have an overlapping flute which is going to mess with chipload at that point. Add on cost and variations possibly needed for the transition point and it starts to leave a bad taste in my mouth.
No problem. Hopefully it’s useful either now or later. I might need to work more on the understandable part though…
PVC/PET mix should be a bit easier to cut in combination as it shouldn’t require quite as high of a chipload than straight PVC.
Assuming you are willing to deal with the multiple steps for the coding you could use just a single tool and modify you chipload and cutting depth per material.
I wouldn’t use a straight flute unless I had to as it’s the highest cutting force of pretty much and geometry. The issue is that unlike a upcut or downcut you are engaging the entire flute at the same time. This causes a very high sharp load to the machine and tool.
I’ll shoot you some specifics tomorrow. For everyone else though the basic things to look for are a higher rake, thinner edge and depending on the weakest material potentially a higher/lower helix. You also want a cutter the has relief and drop to keep only smallest part of the leading edge involved with the material. That last one does cost strength and potentially tool life though. If it’s someone you trust dealing with these kinds of cutters will usually be label for that specific material use. e.g. “soft media cutter”, “plastic cutter”, etc. Not listed as can cut it but that it’s designed for that material.
I did post some on geometry with some examples here Best practice for tiny endmills - #15 by TDA. Might help to understanding some of it. Although it’s in a completely different context. If I can get some time in the next couple days I’ll try to layout the basics in something more approaching english.