Thank, guys for the quick response. I’m still running my g-code through CM and post processing to the Carbide 3D post in 360. Actually, running separate NC files for each tool is how I always did it when going from CC to CM. The design I am trying to run now was very large with multiple “bodies” to cut, so I was trying to streamline things and got a surprise when, after getting the tool change prompt and changing tools that there was no way in CM to go back and zero Z. May consider the bit-setter and, understanding to some extent the post discussion, there is, I suppose, some sort of setting that has to be enabled to allow the tool to re-probe after a tool change?
To follow a bit with another question, I am assuming that if I process each toolpath or similar-tool toolpaths out separately, that the files will assume the order they were in in the setup–that is, if I have an adaptive clearing toolpath with a 201 programmed, then move to, say, a 3D parallel with a ball, that the parallel operation will run under the assumption that the clearing had taken place. In other words, previous cuts will be assumed and interpreted by each subsequent tool operation–as long as I run the files in the same order as they appeared in the job setup.